![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |

60°
Partly Cloudy | 9MPH
NEWSROOM * CIRCULATION * ADVERTISING
Friday
September 2010
3

Bob is a retired education administrator who was an academic administrator for a local university for 28 years and spent almost 10 years as an administrator/manager at an educational association in Brookfield. He and his wife now run a small consulting business called DeRoche Consulting LLC.
Last week I was in the Greendale Village Center where I came across a family from Marquette, Michigan who was visiting Greendale and the Milwaukee area. The family consisted of parents and two adult female children. I started talking to them because they were looking for directions to either Brookfield Square or Mayfair Mall on there way back to Michigan. Since I had been stationed in the Upper Peninsula many years ago in the Coast Guard, I asked the two young ladies how the economy was in Marquette, MI and if the state had developed the old K. I. Sawyer Air Force Base. Sadly they said there had been no real development of that site and that the city and state were really hurting economically. More importantly, they indicated that they relate much more to Wisconsin, than to Michigan. They thought that Michigan really didn’t care about the U.P., particularly the western U.P.
This got me thinking: Maybe Wisconsin should make an offer to Michigan to buy the U.P. and make it part of Wisconsin. After all, it is attached to Wisconsin anyway. It’s only attached to the rest of Michigan via a bridge. According to Wikipedia:“The Upper Peninsula contains almost one-fourth of the land area of Michigan but just three percent of its total population.” So Wisconsin would get a lot of land for its offer, but not a lot of people. Sounds like a good deal, but how much money should we offer? After all, we have our own financial problems. The U.P. land area is 16,420 square miles that equals 10508800 acres. How much should we offer them per acre? This idea could cost Wisconsin a lot of money.
There might be a better way: Let the people of the U.P. vote on becoming part of Wisconsin or staying part of Michigan. As of the 2000 census there were 319,258 people living in the U.P. so a percentage of them would be voting. I wonder how the vote would turn-out. I do not think we should allow all the voters in Michigan to vote because then Wisconsin might not stand a chance. Besides, shouldn’t the people of the U.P. decide this issue? Maybe they are all Packer fans. What do you think?
Perhaps you have heard of the Greenbelt communities which were created during the Great Depression to put people to work and to provide affordable housing. They are: Greendale, WI, Greenhills, OH and Greenbelt, MD. In the fall you will have an opportunity to see all three communities and much more by signing-up for the Greenbelt History Bus Tour sponsored by the Greendale Historical Society. The tour will include our own Greendale and run from September 25 to 30. Included in the tour will be a ride on the Ducks in Newport, OH on the Ohio River near Cincinnati, a tour of Topiary Gardens in Columbus, OH, a tour of Greenbelt, Maryland near Washington, DC, the FDR Memorial and many other sites in DC, and on the way back to Wisconsin a stop at the Shanksville Memorial (9/11 Flight 93) in Pennsylvania. Cost of this first class bus tour is $599 per person for Greendale Historical Society members and $699 for non-members; so if you join the Society you get a great discount. The fee includes deluxe motor coach, lodging, and continental breakfasts. For more information call 414-423-7064.
If you like history and people, this is a great way to see part of American history in a one week tour on a deluxe motor coach.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
Today, May 4, is the 40th anniversary of the killing of four students at Kent State University in Ohio. Several more were injured, some seriously. This was devasting for me. I was a new college administrator at the time and I had just started to manage a new program for in-coming freshmen. I was working with young people on a daily basis. Some would have been drafted if they flunked out of the university. I was newly married with a four month old son. I was hoping he would see a better world. It was bad because I hate war; I hate violence; I hate conflict. Who doesn’t? I couldn’t believe that innocent young people could be killed on an American college campus – a placed where I worked every day. This doesn’t mean there were not two sides to the Kent State story; but young innocent students did not need to die. I was against the Vietnam War, but not against those who had to fight in it. In fact, one of them was my graduate school roommate (living) and another was someone from my hometown who I knew from the neighborhood and as a follow undergraduate (dead). I do believe in St. Thomas Aquinas’s philosophy of a “just war”. In my opinion, this was not one of them. Let’s hope that something similar to the Kent State shootings never happens again.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
Let’s talk about higher education in Milwaukee; specifically, The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. In its current configuration UWM is a young institution having been founded in 1956. For a long time I thought UWM was supposed to be the public university in southeastern Wisconsin designed to serve students from the local area - mostly urban, commuter students. In fact, J. Martin Klotsche the chancellor who managed the original growth of UWM from an enrollment of 1,700 to an enrollment of 25,000 saw the urban location as a unique opportunity and a special responsibility. I think Dr. Klotsche saw UWM as an institution that would serve to provide a university education to metro areas students. For a long time it appeared UWM did that. In other words, as some UWM professors told me some years ago, UWM was not just “a university in a city”, but a true urban university which served to provide a quality education to traditional and adult students in the Milwaukee area. Perhaps they believed UWM did not have to be a national research university, a university that stimulated business start-ups, or a university that would get the majority of its students from other parts of Wisconsin, from out-of-state or from out of the country. If this was the case, then what has UWM become today? We might look to its Mission Statement for the answer. UWM currently describes itself this way: “a major urban doctoral university which needs to meet the diverse needs of Wisconsin’s largest metropolitan area by providing a wide array of degree programs, balanced between applied and basic research, and a faculty that is active in public service” (UWM website). It goes on to give nine academic goals to fulfill this mission. Not until we get to goal number five, do we get to what I, and perhaps many of you, thought was the original mission for UWM when the Legislature established it in 1956. Academic goal five is:
To further academic and professional opportunities at all levels for women, minority, part-time, and financially or educationally disadvantaged students.
My point is this: a “mission statement” should be constant because it provides a general guide for the future development of an organization. What seems to have happened at UWM is that each successive chancellor has tried to shape what UWM should be regardless of the original mission. The predecessor to the current chancellor championed “The Milwaukee Idea” and even wrote a book about it. She may be best known for creating The Milwaukee Partnership Academy. Whatever happened to that? The current chancellor advocates for a new location for the engineering school, a School of Freshwater Sciences, and a School of Public Health. Each chancellor since J. Martin Klotsche had his/her own idea of what UWM should be and each did not stay very long in Milwaukee to see it through (average 5-6 years). So I leave it up to you: Is UWM fulfilling its mission to serve undergraduate students from southeastern Wisconsin?
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
Wisconsin Drivers
I drive to Madison a lot these days on family business. I am frustrated with Wisconsin drivers even though I am one of them. Many of them do not know how to drive on expressways. By this I mean they love to drive slowly in the left lane. Last week I was on my way to Madison and around Oconomowoc I got behind this SUV/ truck type vehicle. It looked more like a small truck than an SUV. I followed him in the left lane for about five miles hoping he would move over when he saw me close behind him or when I blinked my headlights or hit the horn. No way; he was oblivious to my being there. Maybe he was on the phone, but that is no excuse. Anyway, I finally had to pass him on the right – not good although it happens a lot. As I got past him and sped away in the left lane, I watched him in my rearview mirror. He never did move over to the slow lanes as far as I could see. What a hazard. You are not supposed to be in the left lane if you are driving slowly. Why is that so difficult for Wisconsin drivers to understand? We are critical of Illinois drivers, but in many ways they are better express way drivers than Wisconsin drivers. Perhaps the Highway Patrol should start pulling over drivers who do not drive the proper speed in the left lane; but that could be a hazard also. Maybe they should come up behind them and with their bullhorn announce: “Driver of green vehicle: if you are not going to drive the proper speed in this lane, change to the right lane.” Wisconsin drivers need to take classes in how to drive on the freeways.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
You may be following the U.S. Figure Skating Championships on TV or in the newspapers. They are being held in Spokane, WA. Every time I read this I say to myself “Why not hold them in Milwaukee?” They were also held in Spokane in 2007. Milwaukee and southeastern Wisconsin have much more to offer for such an event than Spokane. The city of Milwaukee is three times larger than Spokane. The Milwaukee metro area has a population of about 1.2 million. Spokane has only about 600,000. We could offer them the Bradley Center with the Arena and the Petit Ice Center as a back-up for practices. The BC is larger than the Spokane Arena. We also have a good core of local figure skating clubs and instructors in the Milwaukee area who could offer hospitality and volunteers. Milwaukee has pro sports clubs at the highest level; Spokane doesn’t. Milwaukee has great transportation with nearby Mitchell Field and O’Hare. Think of the money and prestige that would flow into Milwaukee by having such an event. Local and state officials who are responsible for tourism need to make a pitch for these kinds of events to be presented here. If Spokane can do it, we can do it – better.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
I was watching a local TV news program yesterday morning. This is one of those stations that does not tap into a national morning program such as Today or Good Morning America so it was all local. They were interviewing a so-called expert on children’s electronic gadgets/toys. The lady was explaining several electronic gadgets for children. One was a small headphone set – stored flat, easy to carry, and easy for the child to put on his/her head. One of the expert’s comments about the earphones was: “I love these. I put them on my child for the 18 minute ride to school so she can watch/listen to a DVD while I listen to the radio.” What are we coming to, I thought to myself, when we have to put earphones on a child for an 18 minute ride in an SUV. Why do young parents think that children constantly have to be entertained? What happened to the idea that a child can sit quietly in a vehicle, look around and take in the environment as the vehicle proceeds to its destination? This goes along with the belief that we should let children play more on there own instead of trying to constantly entertain them. As parents we did not try to constantly entertain our children either by our own interaction with them or by sitting them in front of the TV. This does not mean that we did not play with them; we did, but not all the time. Children need time to discover things on their own or maybe just sit and think, if possible. I fear that today’s children are too wired and will not be able to develop their imaginations. This would be a sad development in a time when we will need new ways of solving new and old problems.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
Many people are not happy with the Milwaukee Public School System. You may have read that there is a proposed bill in the State Legislature to make the Mayor of Milwaukee responsible for MPS by allowing the Mayor to appoint the MPS Superintendent. I don’t know if this is a good idea or not, but here I propose another solution. Assuming MPS is too large, why not break it up? While some school districts borders correspond to the borders of a city, town, or village (e.g., Greendale, Wauwatosa, Shorewood), many do not (e.g., Elmbrook, Glendale-River Hills, Nicolet UHS). So breaking-up MPS should not be too difficult. I propose that MPS be divided into fourths. A line could be drawn down Wisconsin Avenue from west to east and down 60th street from north to south. One quarter of the MPS District north of Wisconsin Avenue and east of 60th Street would go to districts such as Shorewood, Whitefish Bay and Brown Deer; the quarter south of Wisconsin Ave and east of 60th Street would go to districts such as St. Francis, Cudahy, South Milwaukee, and Oak Creek; the quarter north of Wisconsin Ave. and west of 60th St. would go to West Allis, Wauwatosa and Brown Deer; and the quarter south of Wisconsin Ave. and east of 60th would go to the Greenfield, Greendale, and Franklin school districts. There would be some busing, but we already have a lot of busing. There would be a better mix of students and smaller administrative structures. Would it be perfect? No. Would it be better? Probably yes.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
If you live in suburbs like Greendale, Franklin, or Hales Corners, it is likely that you don’t see many sidewalks in your neighborhood. Some of us have no sidewalks and some have sidewalks only on one side of the street. I am lucky; I have no sidewalk on my side of the street, but there is one on the other side of my street. So when it snows all we have to worry about is our driveway. When we want to go for a walk, we can cross the street and be on our way. Now here is the issue: A Sendix grocery store recently opened about a half mile from our house. We would love to save gas, get exercise, and help the environment by walking to Sendix, but we can’t. Well we could, but we might get run over. The traffic on 51st street is just too heavy to take a chance on walking on the side of the road. I suspect that lots of people in our area of Greendale and folks in new subdivisions in Franklin would also like to walk to Sendix. It would not take much money or planning to build a sidewalk on one side of 51st street from the corner of College Avenue to the intersection of 51st and Rawson, but it would take the will and cooperation of both communities to do it. I’ve heard that some Franklin residents fear any expansion of 51st street. This would not be an expansion, but improvement for the benefit of all. Let your local leaders know that you think building this sidewalk is a good idea.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
If you have ever wanted to see the inside of a Greendale Original home, this weekend is the time to do it. For the second year in a row, the Greendale Historical Society will present Greendale’s Tour of Original Homes on Saturday, September 19 from 10 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. The Tour is a great fun event for visitors and the community. Greendale is one of the nation’s three historic Greenbelt communities and is recognized by the Wisconsin and National Registers of Historic Places. This year, along with the Originals, visitors will be able to explore Greendale’s historic Village Hall. Inspired by the Capitol at Colonial Williamsburg, Virginia, it is a fine example of the Colonial Revival style and its main meeting room has recently undergone a major restoration.
Tickets for the Tour will be on sale in the Village on the day of the event or in advance at the Reiman Visitors Center or online at www.thegreendalehistoricalsociety.org
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
This is about dogs. My wife and I do not have one. We have never had one; although I recall that my wife’s family had a dog when we started dating. Our children wanted a dog when they were younger and living at home, but we are not “dog people”. Besides, we figured if we got a dog for the kids, we are the ones who would eventually care for it (after the novelty wore off). I see people in the neighborhood walking their dog(s). I notice these days that a lot of people have more than one dog; some have two and some three or four. I can’t imagine having two dogs, let alone three or four. Why would they do that to themselves? It often appears that a couple who has two dogs has “him” and “her” dogs. When I see people with two to four dogs, I begin to wonder what they would do if they lost their jobs in these difficult economic times. It seems to me that dogs can be expensive. (We feed the birds and that’s a little costly). Would they sell their dogs? Would they sell the house or the extra car before the dogs? Would they sell two or three dogs to get down to one or none? I’m sure these are difficult questions/decisions for dog owners.
Dogs get people out walking and that’s a good thing. They must make good companions for some (I saw a movie about that). But we won’t be buying a dog ever; they are nice for some, but not for us. Oh, by the way, our married daughter owns a dog – a real pedigree.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
What’s all the fuss about roundabouts? They are those new circles that WisDOT is constructing in roads to avoid installing traffic lights. Some people don’t like them or don’t understand them. I have no problem with roundabouts; I grew up with them. In New England we did not call it a “roundabout”; we called it a “rotary” and we had many of them. You can also call it a “traffic circle”. Anyway, using them is easy – only pull into the circle if there is no traffic coming on your left. In other words, you may have to yield before entering. Once in the circle, proceed as normal. Roundabouts are efficient and work well if each driver does what he/she is supposed to do. I think we will see more of them as our roads are reconstructed. Maybe the DOT should offer some educational seminars on how to use a roundabout for Wisconsin residents who are not familiar with them. See you in the circle!
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
For most of the month of March there did not seem to be any activity at the house next to ours. I didn't think much of it at the time because the young couple who occupied the house was often away. The husband was a truck driver and sometimes his wife would accompany him on trips. They had no children. However, after about five weeks it became apparent that no one was living in the house. Since there was no "For Sale" sign on the front lawn, I became curious and did some research on the Internet. I learned that the house was in foreclosure. I thought to myself, "Not in Greendale". When I went to the police station to look at the Sheriff Auction notices on the bulletin board, I found this house and two others in Greendale. I felt sorry for the young couple. I also felt sorry that the community had lost a nice young couple; the kind all communities need. In April a "For Sale" sign went up.
"Yes, Virginia, it can happen in Greendale, in Fox Point, in Brookfield, and in ....."
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
What is all the fuss about the Bradley Center? You may have read that Governor Doyle has requested $500,000 a year for ten years for a total of $5 million through bonding authority for maintenance of the building. This is natural; any building which is twenty-one years old is going to require some maintenance and up-dating. I like the BC. I go there a lot during the college basketball season and I have been going every season since it was built. The concession areas are good and have been up-dated. The areas for walking to your section or milling around at half time are large enough to accommodate plenty of people and the two atriums at the east and west ends bring light and space to the building. Some people want to tear down the building and start over because they are afraid the Bucks will leave if we do not provide them with a better building. Would you tear down your new house after twenty-one years? I personally don’t care if the Bucks leave. The building seats 18,600 for basketball and Marquette, the Admirals, and arena football seem very satisfied with the BC. In addition to sports the BC very nicely accommodates ice shows, concerts and other events. And for those who want and can afford more comfort, it has plenty of suites. You may recall that the BC was a gift to southeastern Wisconsin. Let’s keep it. We don’t need a new arena.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
It’s Monday morning March 9 and I’m reading the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. The main article in the Local Section is about the dismissal of the President of Milwaukee Area Technical College. What strikes me is not the decision the MATC Board made, but the list of Board members. They are all appointed. None are directly elected to the Board and this Board has taxing authority for the District. The nine members of the MATC Board are appointed by a group of twenty-five school administrators. Since the District goes beyond the boundaries of Milwaukee County, the Board is making taxing decisions affecting those in Milwaukee County and beyond. So why do we allow an appointed Board to tax us? Isn’t this taxation without representation? It happens because the Wisconsin technical college districts were set-up that way by the state legislature. In other words, it’s the law; but the law can be changed if enough taxpaying citizens complain about it. Let’s complain and get this law changed.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
Milwaukee Common Council President Willie Hines Jr. recently proposed that the Milwaukee Public Schools add character building classes to its curriculum or integrate this topic into all of its classes. This is an excellent idea. One definition of character education is the development of life skills necessary for a good/productive personal and social life such as, reasoning skills, emotional skills, social skills and positive character traits including respect, responsibility, courage, perseverance, honesty, fairness, caring, civility, and citizenship. How can anyone argue with that! It is not clear if MPS is aware of the character education movement in this country. While it may say that it does all of the above throughout the curriculum, it appears that it does not do it in a formal, planned way. There is an active curriculum movement in character education in this country. Some school districts in Wisconsin and other parts of the country are way ahead of MPS in implementing it. There are Centers for the teaching of character education at universities on the east and west coasts. These Centers educate teachers and school administrators on what Character Education is and how to implement it. MPS and other school districts in Wisconsin should contact these Centers and learn how to establish character education programs in their districts. With the turmoil that exists in some of our schools and in society in general, particularly in urban/suburban areas, we need to help families by starting to teach students about respect, responsibility, honesty, fairness, caring, courage, civility, and good citizenship.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
I don’t normally comment about another person’s blog. Usually it is not appropriate. However, I feel strongly that I have to comment on a blog written by a Franklin blogger in early January and printed by the Milwaukee Journal in the southwest sections of the NOW.com paper version on January 15. He dealt with the issue of some nursing mothers who wanted to put pictures of themselves nursing on their Facebook accounts on the Internet. In a condescending way he said in the blog “Sorry, sweetheart, but not everyone wants to see that. And not everyone wants to see you breast-feeding wherever you darn well feel like it.” He then pointed out that a state senator was trying to get sponsors to introduce legislation allowing breast-feeding in public. I think he was trying to make two points: one, he didn’t think pictures of nursing mothers should be on Facebook and, two, we really don’t need a law in this area. He did say that he was not opposed to breast-feeding. I hope not; it’s a pretty natural thing to do and healthy for the baby.
What is his problem here? If Facebook doesn’t want these pictures, I guess is up to them, but I personally don’t see any harm in it as long as it is done discreetly. And I am also not sure, as he is, that we need a law in Wisconsin on this, unless many people are objecting when they see a woman breast-feeding in public. I think it is the woman’s right. I came across women breast-feeding twice recently; one in a restaurant in Johnson Creek and one at a board meeting I was attending – no problem. Why is this guy getting all upset about a natural and beautiful event?
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
If you have listened to the Kathy and Judy program on WGN radio, you may know that they do a segment on Wednesdays call “Speak Your Piece”. The basic idea is to call in and say in one or two sentences what really bugs you or gets you upset about daily life. It is sort of a way to get issues “off your chest”. With that in mind, I have decided to list some of the things that really bug me. Here are some of them:
Guys who keep their baseball caps on while eating in a restaurant. What did their
Mothers teach them?
Drivers, particularly in southeastern Wisconsin, who drive slowly in the left lane
on the freeway. Please move over.
People in the grocery check-out line who engage in a conversation with the clerk
and forget there are people behind them.
Drivers who tailgate when I am driving. Keep you distance!
People talking on cell phones in their cars. (I must admit that I occasionally do this.)
If you are interested, let me know what bugs you in the comment section but remember that it has to be one or two sentences. If I receive enough of them, I will post them on my next blog without names, of course.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
Just recently I had the honor and privilege to attend the First Annual Charter Schools Awards Banquet in downtown Milwaukee sponsored by the Wisconsin Charter Schools Association. Charter schools have been in existence in Wisconsin for about ten years. In fact, the 9th Annual Wisconsin Charter Schools Conference will take place in April of 2009. Charter schools are public, nonsectarian schools created through a contract or charter with a state-approved granting agency, usually a school district but sometimes a for-profit organization. In 1991, Minnesota became the first state to enact charter school legislation. Charter schools do some of the following:
· Give school leaders more flexibility when managing their school, allowing them to respond to parents and students needs.· Enable schools to focus their primary mission on improving student achievement.· Give schools more flexibility and control to design their curriculum.· Increases parental options for where to send their child to school.Many might think that most of the charter schools in Wisconsin are in Milwaukee, but that is not the case. While Milwaukee has a fair number of charter schools, the list of nominees for awards reminded us that these schools exist in many parts of Wisconsin including Appleton, Kenosha, Rhinelander, Sheboygan, Oshkosh, Janesville, Verona and some rural school districts. In fact, there is one right here in Greendale chartered by the Greendale School District. It is called Time 4 Learning Charter School and it provides education for four-year olds in Greendale.
Charter schools provide a great alternative for parents and students. We will probably see more of them in Wisconsin in the future
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
|
|||||||||||
We encourage your comments but will strive to remove discussion that contains personal attacks, racial slurs, profanity or other inappropriate material as outlined in our guidelines. We post-moderate comments on most content, but may choose to pre-moderate some comments so please be patient if you don't see yours appear right way. We also ask for your help by reporting comments you think are inappropriate.
Please login or register to post a comment.